Talk:Non-binary gender

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Non-binary gender article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9: 92 days

Agender was nominated for deletion. The discussion was closed on 18 November 2014 with a consensus to merge. Its contents were merged into Non-binary gender. The original page is now a redirect to this page. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected article, please see its history; for its talk page, see here.

Gender studies Mid‑importance

This article is part of WikiProject Gender studies. This WikiProject aims to improve the quality of articles dealing with gender studies and to remove systematic gender bias from Wikipedia. If you would like to participate in the project, you can choose to edit this article, or visit the project page for more information.Gender studiesWikipedia:WikiProject Gender studiesTemplate:WikiProject Gender studiesGender studies articles

Mid

This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

To-do list:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Assess : see Unassessed Gender studies articles and Unknown-importance Gender studies articles
Cleanup : edit to see
Collaborate : see /Collaboration
Copyedit : edit to see
Deletion sorting : see /Sexuality and gender
Expand : edit to see
Infobox : see Gender studies articles needing infoboxes
Merge : edit to see
Notability : edit to see
NPOV : edit to see
Orphans : Brannon Masculinity Scale · Holy Virility · Media and gender · Michael Kaufman (author) · Women's education in Saudi Arabia
Photo : see Wikipedia requested photographs of gender studies
Split : History of feminism
Stubs : see Gender studies stubs
Translate : see /translation
Update : edit to see
Verify : Riot grrrl
Needs attention : see Gender studies articles needing attention

LGBTQ+ studies

This article is of interest to WikiProject LGBTQ+ studies, which tries to ensure comprehensive and factual coverage of all LGBTQ-related issues on Wikipedia. For more information, or to get involved, please visit the project page or contribute to the discussion.LGBTQ+ studiesWikipedia:WikiProject LGBTQ+ studiesTemplate:WikiProject LGBTQ+ studiesLGBT articles

Wiki Loves Pride

This article was created or improved during Wiki Loves Pride, 2015, 2016 and 2017.Wiki Loves PrideWikipedia:Wiki Loves PrideTemplate:Wiki Loves Pride talkWiki Loves Pride articles

The contentious topics procedure applies to this page. This page is related to gender-related disputes or controversies or people associated with them, which has been designated as a contentious topic.

Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. Editors are advised to familiarise themselves with the contentious topics procedures before editing this page.

Section sizes

Section size for Non-binary gender (33 sections)
Section name	Byte count	Section total
(Top)	6,209	6,209
Terms and definitions	11,008	11,008
Identities	18	18,443
Agender	3,950	3,950
Multigender/polygender	1,638	10,956
Bigender	5,049	5,049
Demigender	951	951
Pangender	1,015	1,015
Genderfluid	2,303	2,303
Transfeminine or transmasculine	849	849
Two-spirit	782	782
Xenogender	1,601	1,601
Other identities	287	287
History	12,361	12,361
Pronouns and titles	7,437	7,437
Legal recognition	7,612	7,612
Discrimination	4,369	4,369
Healthcare	3,883	8,305
Transgender health care	2,957	2,957
Mental health care	1,465	1,465
Symbols and observances	11,158	11,158
Population figures	23	10,603
Argentina	1,605	1,605
Brazil	1,511	1,511
Canada	1,974	1,974
Switzerland	1,229	1,229
United Kingdom	1,313	1,313
United States	2,948	2,948
See also	647	647
Explanatory notes	36	36
References	28	28
Further reading	3,344	3,344
External links	456	456
Total	102,016	102,016

This article has previously been nominated to be moved. Please review the prior discussions if you are considering re-nomination.

Discussions:

RM, Genderqueer → Non-binary gender, No consensus, 4 June 2016 (See discussion.)
RM, Genderqueer → Non-binary gender, No consensus, 1 August 2017 (See discussion.)
RM, Genderqueer → Non-binary gender identities, No consensus, 4 June 2018 (See discussion.)
RM, Genderqueer → Non-binary, Moved to Non-binary gender, 1 May 2019 (See discussion.)

This article has been viewed enough times in a single week to appear in the Top 25 Report. The week in which this happened:

May 16 to 22, 2021

Jens Andersson

Article mentions Jens Andersson as a historical example for non-binary gender. Please see the two sections of sources below, Andersson was in a same sex relationship during a time when this was an illegal act, and was imprisoned for such. Prescribing a gender identity post mortem is not scholarly work, and this is also mentioned in the first highlighted source.

Recommending that this example be removed.

Sources:

https://www.nb.no/historier-fra-samlingen/jens-og-anne-christine/#:~:text=Nyborg%20points%20out,how%20I%20am%22.

https://skeivtarkiv.no/en/skeivopedia/sodomy-between-women#:~:text=Another%20case%20which,court.%20(Stoa%202010). 76.184.170.169 (talk) 06:44, 1 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Creating a "Media representation" section?

Instead of jumping ahead and creating this section, I thought I'd post here first. Other identities have robust sections of this type, like Lesbian#Media representation, Bisexuality#Media, Asexuality#In media, and Intersex#In society. I was thinking of moving SOME content from Non-binary characters in fiction to such a section. I can come up with a mock version of this possible section if you think that would help. Otherwise, I am trying to pair down Non-binary characters in fiction a bit (focusing mainly on examples either with media coverage or scholarly analysis), so if you would like to help with that, it would be appreciated. Historyday01 (talk) 15:56, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It would be best to base such a section on scholarly analysis if so. Some of that material, like at Bisexuality, just lists off certain media and cites contemporary entertainment news, which isn't as good. Crossroads ^-talk- 17:53, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I can agree with that, that makes perfect sense. Historyday01 (talk) 19:07, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Grammatical error in lead section

this is going to sound really stupid but at the very start of the article where it talks about gender and sexuality being separate, there's a colon and there should be a semicolon instead but i don't have a wikipedia account and it's 2am

64.193.85.10 (talk) 07:03, 25 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I did the edit, and a few more wording fixes. Thank you for pointing out this error.

By the way, you can consider creating an account. See WP:ACCOUNT for the benefits of an account and criteria for creating an account. If you are having more trouble deciding whether to create one, you should also see Wikipedia:Why not create an account?

Thank you — CrafterNova ^{[ TALK ] [ CONT ]} 07:16, 26 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Percent or percent units?

Under Pronouns and titles, changes of part of people in the survey compared to the last survey are written as if they were percent, however, this seems to be supposed to be in percent units. Is this correct? Gurkmaztha (talk) 20:21, 3 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]