Jump to content

User talk:Humanist

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Hey Humanist :) I hope you like the place and choose to stay.

Some links that may be of use:

Keep contributing, and have fun :) Dysprosia 12:49, 9 Nov 2003 (UTC)

Hi Humanist, I have a small tip for you regarding talk pages. On most talk pages you may see, the horizontal rules are used to seperate different conversations altogether, not different responses, where a simple line/paragraph break and an indent usually suffices. You can sign your responses and such using 4 tildes: ~~~~, which automatically places a link to your user page and the date and time as well. Thanks :) Dysprosia 00:53, 10 Nov 2003 (UTC)

Done. Humanist

Greetings fellow INTJ! Nice edits so far, however if you could use the preview function more often and do more for each editing session, then the history of the pages you edit will not be filled with too many different versions. Cheers! --mav 00:15, 15 Nov 2003 (UTC)

Yes, I can understand your comment. Unfortunately I have a strong tendency to write iteratively, with many changes over time. It would be a change of style to write in nice complete blocks, and certainly take me more effort. (I do this as a relaxation.)
I will try to use the preview function more, although I am also an inveterate "saver" of documents, in order not to lose anything written so far. This has become even more ingrained in my wikipedia writing after quite early on losing longer edits due to parallel editing by others.
How detrimental is my hit-and-run style? Is it just cosmetic, or does it cause real problems?
Cheers, Humanist
It does result in your user name dominating the page history of whatever you are working on. Just use a good text editor to edit in. I use KWord and I save all my edits to a file named "temp.kwd". When I'm done editing I simply copy the text I was working on and put it into Wikipedia. If something then goes wrong with Wikipedia or my browser crashes then all I do is copy the text again. Then for the next article I do the same thing (using temp.kwd - overwriting my previous text). --mav 04:05, 15 Nov 2003 (UTC)

Hey! It's good to finally see someone else from Perth on here. I've been editing Wikipedia on-and-off for between one and two years. I really can't remember how long. But on my preferences page it says my user ID number is 120 or something like that. I doubt I joined that early on. Strange.

Anyway, I hope you find Wikipedia rewarding. I tend to get the inspriation and time to have short bursts at it, but lose interest really quickly.

It'd be good if you could contribute to Perth, Western Australia. I really want it to be better than the pages for all the other Australian capitals. :)

Mark Ryan 12:23, 16 Nov 2003 (UTC)

Hi Mark!
That is an impressive ID number. I think mine is 29,700.
I started writing a short time ago on Wikipedia because of a page I happened to find when I was searching through Google. I did have a look at the Perth, WA page with the intention that if it needed some work I would move it along. I fact, I decided it was already pretty good. The aerial photo is a nice touch.
If I can find some bits to add, I will.
Cheers, Humanist 13:40, 16 Nov 2003 (UTC)

Hi. THis is just a notice to let you know that The discussion regaridng OpenOffice moved from Village Pump to Talk:OpenOffice.org. Optim 15:03, 1 Feb 2004 (UTC)

hello

[edit]

Hello! :) I thought you might be interested in this. Check it out and add your name under "Participants" if your interested. Have a nice day and happy editing! --Grrrlriot (talk) 18:53, 6 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 08:54, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

[edit]

Hello, Humanist. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]