Implosive consonant
IPA: Implosive consonants | ||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||
Implosive consonants are a group of stop consonants (and possibly also some affricates) with a mixed glottalic ingressive and pulmonic egressive airstream mechanism.[1] That is, the airstream is controlled by moving the glottis downward in addition to expelling air from the lungs. Therefore, unlike the purely glottalic ejective consonants, implosives can be modified by phonation. Contrastive implosives are found in approximately 13%[2] of the world's languages.
In the International Phonetic Alphabet, implosives are indicated by modifying the top of a letter (voiced stop) with a rightward-facing hook: ⟨ɓ ɗ ᶑ ʄ ɠ ʛ⟩.
Articulation
[edit]During the occlusion of the stop, pulling the glottis downward rarefies the air in the vocal tract. The stop is then released. In languages whose implosives are particularly salient, that may result in air rushing into the mouth before it flows out again with the next vowel. To take in air sharply in that way is to implode a sound.[3]
However, probably more typically, there is no movement of air at all, which contrasts with the burst of the pulmonary plosives. This is the case with many of the Kru languages, for example. That means that implosives are phonetically sonorants (not obstruents) as the concept of sonorant is usually defined. However, implosives can phonologically pattern as both; that is, they may be phonological sonorants or obstruents depending on the language.
George N. Clements (2002) actually proposes that implosives are phonologically neither obstruents nor sonorants.[4]
The vast majority of implosive consonants are voiced, so the glottis is only partially closed. Because the airflow required for voicing reduces the vacuum being created in the mouth, implosives are easiest to make with a large oral cavity.[citation needed]
Types
[edit]Implosives are most often voiced stops, occasionally voiceless stops. Individual tokens of glottalized sonorants (nasals, trills, laterals, etc.) may also be pronounced with a lowering of the glottis by some individuals, occasionally to the extent that they are noticeably implosive, but no language is known where implosion is a general characteristic of such sounds.[5]
Voiced implosives
[edit]The attested voiced implosive stops are the following:
- voiced bilabial implosive [ɓ]
- voiced alveolar implosive [ɗ]
- voiced retroflex implosive [ᶑ] (letter is 'implicit' in the IPA)
- voiced palatal implosive [ʄ]
- voiced velar implosive [ɠ]
- voiced uvular implosive [ʛ]
- voiced labial–velar implosive [ɠ͜ɓ]
There are no IPA symbols for implosive fricatives, and no confirmed cases of implosive fricatives or affricates. Implosive affricates are occasionally reported, but further investigation typically reveals that such sounds are either stops or not implosive. For example, the Swahili j has an implosive allophone, but the distinction is pulmonic affricate [dʒ] vs implosive stop [ʄ].[6] Similarly, implosive [ɗʒ] has been reported from Roglai, but it has also been analyzed as [ʄ],[7] and the implosive affricates reported from Gitxsan turn out to be lenis ejectives that are sometimes perceived as voiced.[8]
Voiceless implosives
[edit]Consonants variously called "voiceless implosives," "implosives with glottal closure,"[9] or "reverse ejectives" involve a slightly different airstream mechanism, purely glottalic ingressive.[1] The glottis is closed so no pulmonic airstream is possible. The IPA once dedicated symbols ⟨ƥ ƭ 𝼉 ƈ ƙ ʠ ƙ͜ƥ⟩ to such sounds. These were withdrawn in 1993 and replaced with a voiceless diacritic, ⟨ɓ̥ ɗ̥ ᶑ̥ ʄ̊ ɠ̊ ʛ̥ ɠ̊͜ɓ̥⟩, though ⟨ƥ ƭ ƈ⟩ remain in Serer orthography. Some authors disagree with the analysis implied by the IPA voiceless diacritic and retain the dedicated voiceless letters, or, occasionally, transcribe them instead as ingressive ejectives ⟨pʼ↓ tʼ↓ ʈʼ↓ cʼ↓ kʼ↓ qʼ↓ k͡pʼ↓⟩. The IPA had also suggested the possibility of a superscript left pointer, ⟨p˂ t˂ ʈ˂ c˂ k˂ q˂ k͡p˂⟩, which might also be used for fricatives, but it was not approved by the membership.
The attested voiceless implosive stops are:
- voiceless bilabial implosive [ɓ̥] or [ƥ]
- voiceless alveolar implosive [ɗ̥ ] or [ƭ]
- voiceless retroflex implosive [ᶑ̥ ] or [𝼉]
- voiceless palatal implosive [ʄ̥ ] or [ƈ ]
- voiceless velar implosive [ɠ̊ ] or [ƙ] (may be paraphonemic in English)
- voiceless uvular implosive [ʛ̥ ] or [ʠ ]
- voiceless labial–velar implosive [ɠ̊͜ɓ̥] or, [ƙ͜ƥ]
Bilabial | Dental | Alveolar | Retroflex | Palatal | Velar | Labial– velar |
Uvular | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Voiceless | ƥ | ƭ̪ | ƭ | 𝼉 | ƈ | ƙ | ƙ͜ƥ | ʠ |
Voiced | ɓ | ɗ̪ | ɗ | ᶑ | ʄ | ɠ | ɠ͜ɓ | ʛ |
Occurrence
[edit]In the world's languages, the occurrence of implosives shows a strong cline from front to back points of articulation. Bilabial [ɓ] is the most common implosive. It is very rarely lacking in the inventory of languages which have implosive stops. On the other hand, implosives with a back articulation (such as velar [ɠ]) occur much less frequently; apart from a few exceptions, the presence of the velar implosive [ɠ] goes along with the presence of implosives further forward.[11] One of the few languages with a farther back implosive (specifically the alveolar one [ɗ]), and without the bilabial implosive, is Yali, a Dani language spoken on the Indonesian side of New Guinea.[12]
Implosives are widespread among the languages of Sub-Saharan Africa and Southeast Asia and are found in a few languages of the Amazon Basin. They are rarely reported elsewhere but occur in scattered languages such as the Mayan languages in North America, Saraiki and Sindhi in the Indian subcontinent. They appear to be entirely absent as phonemes from Europe and northern Asia and from Australia, even from the Australian ceremonial language Damin, which uses every other possible airstream mechanism besides percussives. However, Alpher (1977) reports that the Nhangu language of Australia may actually contain implosives, though more research is needed to determine the true nature of these sounds. Implosives may occasionally occur phonetically in some European languages: For instance, in some northern dialects of Ingrian, intervocalic bilabial stops may be realised as the implosive [ɓ] or [ɓ̥].[13]
Fully voiced stops are slightly implosive in a number of other languages, but this is not often described explicitly if there is no contrast with modal-voiced plosives. This situation occurs from Maidu to Thai to many Bantu languages, including Swahili.
Sindhi and Saraiki have an unusually large number of contrastive implosives, with /ɓ ᶑ ʄ ɠ/.[9][14] Although Sindhi has a dental–retroflex distinction in its plosives, with /b d ɖ ɟ ɡ/, the contrast is neutralized in the implosives. A contrastive retroflex implosive /ᶑ/ may also occur in Ngad'a, a language spoken in Flores, Indonesia,[15] and occurs in Wadiyara Koli, a language spoken in India and Pakistan where it contrasts with the voiced alveolar implosive /ɗ/.[16]
More examples can be found in the articles on individual implosives.
Voiceless implosives are quite rare, but are found in languages as varied as the Owere dialect of Igbo in Nigeria (/ƥ/ /ƭ/), Krongo in Sudan, the Uzere dialect of Isoko, the closely related Lendu and Ngiti languages in the Democratic Republic of Congo, Serer in Senegal (/ƥ ƭ ƈ/), and some dialects of the Poqomchi’ and Quiche languages in Guatemala (/ƥ ƭ/). Owere Igbo has a seven-way contrast among bilabial stops, /pʰ p ƥ bʱ b ɓ m/, and its alveolar stops are similar. The voiceless velar implosive [ƙ] occurs marginally in Uspantek[17] and /ʠ/ occurs in Mam, Kaqchikel, and Uspantek.[18] Lendu has been claimed to have voiceless /ƥ ƭ ƈ/, but they may actually be creaky-voiced implosives.[9] The voiceless labial–velar implosive [ƙ͜ƥ] also may occur in Central Igbo.[19][20]
Some English speakers use a voiceless velar implosive [ƙ] to imitate the "glug-glug" sound of liquid being poured from a bottle, but others use a voiced implosive [ɠ].[21]
References
[edit]- ^ a b Ball, Martin J.; Müller, Nicole (2014-02-04). Phonetics for Communication Disorders. doi:10.4324/9781315805573. ISBN 978-1-315-80557-3.
- ^ Maddieson, Ian. 2008. Glottalized Consonants. In: Haspelmath, Martin & Dryer, Matthew S. & Gil, David & Comrie, Bernard (eds.) The World Atlas of Language Structures Online. Munich: Max Planck Digital Library, chapter 7. Accessed on 2008-03-28 via Wals info.
- ^ "Implode" (2. [with obj.] [phonetic terminology]: utter or pronounce (a consonant) with a sharp intake of air.) New Oxford American Dictionary 3rd ed., 2010
- ^ Clements, George. "Explosives, Implosives, and Nonexplosives: the Linguistic Function of Air Pressure Differences in Stops" (PDF). Retrieved 19 November 2024.
- ^ Esling, John H.; Moisik, Scott R.; Benner, Allison; Crevier-Buchman, Lise (2019). Voice Quality: The Laryngeal Articulator Model. Cambridge University Press.
- ^ Contini-Morava, Ellen. 1997. Swahili Phonology. In Kaye, Alan S. (ed.), Phonologies of Asia and Africa 2, 841–860. Winona Lake, Indiana: Eisenbrauns.
- ^ Lee Ernest. 1966. Proto-Chamic phonologic word and vocabulary. PhD dissertation, Indiana University at Bloomington.
- ^ Gitxsan "does not have voiced implosive stops; rather, it has lax glottalized stops that display a creaky voice quality at the margin of the vowel in pretonic (and syllable-final) environments." — Bruce Rigsby & John Ingram (1990) "Obstruent Voicing and Glottalic Obstruents in Gitksan". International Journal of American Linguistics, vol. 56, no. 2, pp. 251–263.
- ^ a b c Ladefoged, Peter; Maddieson, Ian (1996). The Sounds of the World's Languages. Oxford: Blackwell. ISBN 0-631-19815-6.
- ^ Bickford & Floyd (2006) Articulatory Phonetics, Table 25.1, augmented by sources at the articles on individual consonants
- ^ Greenberg, Joseph H. (1970). "Some Generalizations concerning Glottalic Consonants, Especially Implosives". International Journal of American Linguistics. 36 (2): 123–145. doi:10.1086/465105. JSTOR 1264671. S2CID 143225017.
- ^ Fahner, Christiaan (1979). The Morphology of Yali and Dani: A Descriptive and Comparative Analysis.
- ^ N. V. Kuznetsova (2009). Фонологические системы Ижорских диалектов [The phonological systems of the Ingrian dialects]. Institute for Linguistic Studies (dissertation). p. 181.
- ^ Swahili has a similar /ɓ ɗ ʄ ɠ/, without contrasting with voiced pulmonic stops, unlike in Sindhi.
- ^ Djawanai, Stephanus. (1977). A description of the basic phonology of Nga'da and the treatment of borrowings. NUSA linguistic studies in Indonesian and languages in Indonesia, 5, 10-18
- ^ ZUBAIR, SAEED (April 2016). A Phonological Description of Wadiyara, a Language Spoken in Pakistan (PDF) (MA). Payap University. p. 2. Retrieved 9 October 2020.
- ^ Bennett, Ryan; Harvey, Meg; Henderson, Robert; Méndez López, Tomás Alberto (September 2022). "The phonetics and phonology of Uspanteko (Mayan)". Language and Linguistics Compass. 16 (9). doi:10.1111/lnc3.12467. ISSN 1749-818X. S2CID 252453913.
- ^ England, Nora C. (1983). A grammar of Mam, a Mayan language. Austin: University of Texas Press. ISBN 0292729278. OCLC 748935484.
- ^ Bickford & Floyd (2006) Articulatory Phonetics
- ^ Clark, Mary M. (1990). The Tonal System of Igbo. doi:10.1515/9783110869095. ISBN 9783110130416.
- ^ Pike, Phonetics, 1943:40
Bibliography
[edit]- Clements, George N.; Sylvester Osu (2002). "Explosives, Implosives, and Nonexplosives: the Linguistic Function of Air Pressure Differences in Stops" (PDF). Laboratory Phonology. Vol. 7. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. pp. 299–350. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2011-07-20. Retrieved 2010-01-08.
- Demolin, Didier; Ngonga-Ke-Mbembe, Hubert; Soquet, Alain (2002). "Phonetic characteristics of an unexploded palatal implosive in Hendo". Journal of the International Phonetic Association. 32 (1): 1–15. doi:10.1017/S0025100302000117. JSTOR 44526273. S2CID 143737389.
- Ladefoged, Peter; Maddieson, Ian (1996). The Sounds of the World's Languages. Oxford: Blackwell. ISBN 0-631-19815-6.
- Maddieson, Ian (1984). Patterns of sounds. Cambridge studies in speech science and communication. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/CBO9780511753459. ISBN 978-0-521-26536-2.