Jump to content

Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/Traduki

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Of all planned languages (not really "artificial", since the words they use have " real" language etymologies, , Esperanto seems to be the one that has been able to make more progress. Many works of literature have been translated into Esperanto, and there are probably more accurate bilingual dictionaries in which Esperanto is one of the languages than other bilingual dictionaries. It is more difficult to find a word in a decent, hypothetical dictionary, say, Finnish-Tagalog (if it exists) than to find the same way through a system of dictionaries Esperanto-Tagalog and Esperanto-Finnish. A computer that has both can translate faster and with more accuracy.

I think that to delete would deprive the public of important information.

Thank you for asking.


R. García Bárcena Director Inlingua Schools - Puerto Rico

Start a discussion about improving the Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Traduki page

Start a discussion