Jump to content

Talk:Constantine Samuel Rafinesque

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Untitled

[edit]

I can provide you with at least 166 names of plants relating to descriptions by Rafinesque. They are mainly cacti and succulents as they have my fancy. GerardM 18:12, 11 May 2004 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your offer. But wouldn't this be a bit too exhaustive ? Rafinesque named more than a thousand species, many of them now considered invalid. Maybe this is a good idea for starting a new article : Species named by Rafinesque. When you look in ITIS you will find lots of them. On the other hand, wouldn't you consider contributing to the WikiProject:Gastropods ? I could use some help, especially from someone with wide interests. JoJan 18:24, 11 May 2004 (UTC)[reply]

Rafinesque-Schmaltz incorrect

[edit]

It is true that Rafinesque may have occasionally used the name Rafinesque-Schmaltz, but this is not correct in a reference of this type. His name should be Rafinesque, and that is the name he used in virtually all of his publications. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Avihathor (talkcontribs) 5 December 2006.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was PAGE MOVED per discussion below. -GTBacchus(talk) 00:34, 11 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move

[edit]

Constantine Samuel Rafinesque-SchmaltzConstantine Samuel Rafinesque — per the above, this figure is far more commonly known simply as Rafinesque (unhyphenated), both in his own works and when cited by others. Article should be at this most common name, this WP:RM raised since the move is obstructed (target has non-trivial edit history) and needs admin action to effect. cjllw | TALK 05:37, 6 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Survey

[edit]
Add  * '''Support'''  or  * '''Oppose'''  on a new line followed by a brief explanation, then sign your opinion using ~~~~.

Discussion

[edit]
Add any additional comments:
As an admin I can make this move easily, but the considerable number of double redirects will be a pain in the neck. JoJan 09:41, 6 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
If you are game to go ahead with the move then pls do so, happy to help out with the redirects.--cjllw | TALK 09:44, 6 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

It was only while living in Sicily (1805-1815) that Rafinesque added his mother's maiden name in an effort to conceal his French ancestry, because Sicily (then controlled by the British) was under threat of invasion by the French. As a consequence, his publications during that period (including the very important Analyse de la Nature) appeared under the name Rafinesque-Schmaltz. These are his publications most likely to be held by European libraries, where his name has habitually been given in the hyphenated form. He never published under that form in the United States, however. So here he has been known habitually as Rafinesque. C.Boewe 03:36, 8 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

Rafinesque's original works

[edit]

A number of Rafinesque’s books and pamphlets are available, online, in facsimile for free. It would be of benefit to readers if these are listed in the Rafinesque entry, but I find that none of the URLs associated with them will open the document when pasted into another site. In each case it is necessary to click through a number of Web pages to reach the document.

I do not know how to mount this information and will be grateful if someone who does will enter it.


Philadelphia’s Academy of Natural Sciences http://nolan.acnatsci.org/search

Ichthyologia Ohiensis

Western Minerva


Gallica at the Bibliothèque Nationale de France http://gallica.bnf.fr/

A Life of Travels

Alsographia Americana

American Manual of the Mulberry Trees

American Manual of the Grape Vines

Analyse de la Nature

Atlantic Journal and Friend of Knowledge

Autikon Botanikon

Bulletin of the Historical and Natural Sciences, nos. 1, 3, 5, 7

Chloris Aetnensis

Circular Address on Botany and Zoology

Flora Telluriana

Florula Ludoviciana

Herbarium Rafinesquianum

Manual of the Medical Botany of the United States

Medical Flora, 2 vols.

Monographie des Coquilles Bivalves Fluviatiles de la Rivière Ohio

Neogenyton

New Flora and Botany of North America

Précis des Découvertes et Travaux Somiologiques

Sylva Telluriana

The Complete Writings of Constantine Smaltz Rafinesque on Recent and Fossil Conchology, ed. by G. Binney and George W. Tryon

The Good Book, and Amenities of Nature

Western Minerva


Library of Congress http://www.loc.gov/index.html

A Life of Travels

Ancient History, or, Annals of Kentucky

Medical Flora, 2 vols.

Patent Divitial Invention (description)


C.Boewe 00:41, 2 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi C.Boewe, a useful bibliography. Since these works are presumably Public Domain, one approach would be to add their text to the Wikisource sister project, which is set up to hold original free texts. At least the most significant ones could be placed there. Then it is quite easy to link to them from wikipedia via one of the {{wikisource}} templates. Wikisource works quite like wikipedia, one could easily create an account there and create the pages for the entries. I haven't checked the links you've given, but if they are in copyable text format then the job would be quite easy; if they are actual scans of pamphlets then the job would of course be more difficult.--cjllw | TALK 07:03, 4 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
As Rafinesque's bibliographer (and biographer) I can assure that all the titles listed above are public domain, and I will be happy to see the texts included in Wikisource.C.Boewe 15:11, 22 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Nonsense about Rafinesque

[edit]

Much of this article is nonsense because largely based on secondary articles which, in turn, mostly repeat the "traditional" beliefs about the man. I do not have the time or energy to make all the corrections needed here, but my recent Rafinesque biography (published by the American Philosophical Society in 2011) gives a true account of this interesting person and comes accompanied by a CD containing transcripts of more than 2,000 pages of his correspondence on which the narrative of the book, along with the subject's own brief autobiography, is based. Moreover, this text also identifies--citing chapter and verse--the origins of the principal myths about Rafinesque. C.Boewe (talk) 03:27, 4 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Pranked by Audubon

[edit]

This is worthy of inclusion. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 10:22, 29 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Yes. There are more sources, perhaps entirely about the fish. A good way to find them is to search for Rafinesque and "violin". Sminthopsis84 (talk) 14:02, 29 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Mycologist

[edit]

On what is the classification as mycologist based?--Kopiersperre (talk) 09:49, 5 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Association with New Harmony

[edit]

Rafinesque was a contributor to the New Harmony Gazette, of Robert Owen's utopian community in Indiana, for which he wrote about his financial innovation, a new system of banking he called the "Divitial Invention," which he patented in 1825. New Harmony did not use it, but The Divitial Institution of North America and Six-Percent Savings Bank opened in Philadelphia in 1835. (Observed in Erik Reece's book, Utopia Drive, pp. 107-108.) Lippard (talk) 23:12, 24 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Constantine Samuel Rafinesque. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:43, 12 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Constantine Samuel Rafinesque. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:42, 14 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]