Talk:Adam
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Adam article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
![]() | The subject of this article is controversial and content may be in dispute. When updating the article, be bold, but not reckless. Feel free to try to improve the article, but don't take it personally if your changes are reversed; instead, come here to the talk page to discuss them. Content must be written from a neutral point of view. Include citations when adding content and consider tagging or removing unsourced information. |
![]() | This ![]() It is of interest to multiple WikiProjects. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 180 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 1 section is present. |
lead section
[edit]The lead section has paragraphs on the view of Adam from Christian, Muslim, and Gnostic viewpoints. It seems to me that there a similar paragraph about the Jewish viewpoint. Ike9898 (talk) 16:36, 1 March 2024 (UTC)
- The reason is that the leadsection is a summary of the article, but there is no section about Judaism in the body of text. (And no, Judaism is not Christianity without the New Testament). As soon as there is a section dedicated to the concept of Adam from Judaism, based on reliable sources (Original researches from Torah, Tanakh, etc. are not reliable), a paragraph for the Jewish perspective can be added. Therefore, the lead should be added by another topic as soon as there is more in the body of text.
- best regards VenusFeuerFalle (talk) 17:21, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
References
Not done: This is a lot of text that doesn't really come across as encyclopedic. PianoDan (talk) 23:27, 18 March 2024 (UTC)
Concerns about inapproprite photos
[edit]Dear Wikipedia Editors, I hope this message finds you well. I am writing to express my concerns about the images currently displayed on the article about Adam (alayhi salam). The images in question depicts a naked man and, as such, may not be appropriate or respectful, considering the religious and cultural sensitivities surrounding the depiction of religious figures. Adam (alayhi salam) is a significant figure in many religious traditions, and there is no verified or accepted image of him. Consequently, I believe that displaying such an image may not be suitable and could be perceived as disrespectful. Could you please consider removing the image or replacing it with content that adheres to Wikipedia’s guidelines on sensitivity and respect for religious and cultura LILIA ROSALIE (talk) 18:32, 29 July 2024 (UTC)
- Hello, LILIA ROSALIE, can you point to the WP policy on sensitivity and respect that this particular imagine goes against? Wikipedia is not censored, and I don't know if I agree that the image in question is offensive or inappropriate. Or, can you point toward an image that would be more aligned with what you're looking for? SPF121188 (talk this way) (my edits) 18:41, 29 July 2024 (UTC)
- Hello SPF121188, Thank you for your response. I appreciate the policy on censorship and understand your point. However, my concern is more about cultural and religious sensitivity rather than censorship. Depicting religious figures, especially in a manner that can be perceived as disrespectful, could offend many people from different backgrounds. Could we perhaps find an alternative image or representation that respects these sensitivities? and personally i find the most of them offensive cause those drawings don't represent him. LILIA ROSALIE (talk) 20:02, 29 July 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected edit request on 27 August 2024
[edit]![]() | It is requested that an edit be made to the semi-protected article at Adam. (edit · history · last · links · protection log)
This template must be followed by a complete and specific description of the request, that is, specify what text should be removed and a verbatim copy of the text that should replace it. "Please change X" is not acceptable and will be rejected; the request must be of the form "please change X to Y".
The edit may be made by any autoconfirmed user. Remember to change the |
With regards to the 'In Islam' section, in the second paragraph, the claim that 'for God never punishes one person for the sins of another' lacks an appropriate citation.
Below, I have added a link to the quranic verse which discusses this specific matter. I believe that it could be used as a citation source, just like in the first paragraph of this section.
Source: https://quran.com/35/18
Thank you for your time and help! EdiRayman (talk) 02:04, 27 August 2024 (UTC)
- Wikipedia controversial topics
- C-Class vital articles
- Wikipedia level-5 vital articles
- Wikipedia vital articles in Philosophy and religion
- C-Class level-5 vital articles
- Wikipedia level-5 vital articles in Philosophy and religion
- C-Class vital articles in Philosophy and religion
- C-Class biography articles
- WikiProject Biography articles
- C-Class Religion articles
- Top-importance Religion articles
- WikiProject Religion articles
- C-Class Mythology articles
- Top-importance Mythology articles
- C-Class Judaism articles
- Top-importance Judaism articles
- C-Class Christianity articles
- High-importance Christianity articles
- C-Class Christian theology articles
- High-importance Christian theology articles
- Christian theology work group articles
- C-Class Saints articles
- Mid-importance Saints articles
- WikiProject Saints articles
- WikiProject Christianity articles
- C-Class Catholicism articles
- Mid-importance Catholicism articles
- WikiProject Catholicism articles
- C-Class Islam-related articles
- Top-importance Islam-related articles
- WikiProject Islam articles
- C-Class Bahá'í Faith articles
- Low-importance Bahá'í Faith articles
- WikiProject Bahá'í Faith articles
- C-Class Bible articles
- Top-importance Bible articles
- WikiProject Bible articles
- C-Class Ancient Near East articles
- Low-importance Ancient Near East articles
- Ancient Near East articles by assessment
- Wikipedia semi-protected edit requests