Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/BloodRuby

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
  • Agree, if they don't even have an album, they don't belong. When album is recorded (assuming it's not self-published and is moderately well known) we can have a page on them (obviously not this one--POV problems). Meelar 07:03, 2 May 2004 (UTC)[reply]
I suggest this whole thread be deemed void and this vote be started again, i rewrote the whole article to a NPOV (see this diff) so the votes cast here really dont count since they all reflect a judgement on the old article, it would be a shame to delete this now. (Disclaimer: I am not involved with Blood Ruby nor have i ever listened to their music) --Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason 14:40, 2004 May 8 (UTC)
In cases like these, usually we just keep the thread going and people will change their comments as they see fit. Our fine sysops implementing deletion (hi Angela! :) will consider the article changes when it's time to execute the deletion-or-keeping. - Fennec 14:50, May 8, 2004 (UTC)
The general rule is that performers need an audience of 5,000 or more to be included. My vote stands. Deletion votes should NOT be deemed void as people can strike out their votes if they wish to change them. --bodnotbod 15:08, May 8, 2004 (UTC)
  • POV or otherwise, it's still not famous. Delete anyway. - Fennec 14:50, May 8, 2004 (UTC)