User:Winhunter
Winhunter (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) joined Wikipedia in 12 April, 2005 and became an administrator on 4 September, 2006.
Languages | ||
---|---|---|
| ||
Search user languages |
Userbox | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||||||
Search user languages |
No current discussions. Recent RfAs, recent RfBs: (successful, unsuccessful) |
Articles I...
[edit]Created
[edit]- Nationality Law of the People's Republic of China
- Higher education in Hong Kong (Translated)
- Hong Kong Institute of Vocational Education (Translated)
- Learn from Dazhai in agriculture
- University Grants Committee
Expanded significantly
[edit]My other accounts
[edit]- WinBot (BRFA · contribs · actions log · block log · flag log · user rights)
- Winpublic (talk · contribs · count) (For use in public computers)
My bookmarks
[edit]
Administrative backlog
[edit]Reports
[edit]User-reported
[edit]- 5.126.143.119 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – vandalism, including: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 --WikiUser1234945-- (talk) 10:18, 30 July 2024 (UTC)
- OFFICIALFUEGO (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- Pooper12345678 (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
This username matched "Poop" on the blacklist. -- DQB (owner / report) 06:00, 30 July 2024 (UTC)
- Jihadilemord (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- Js19cleanbot (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
User-reported
[edit]- APaul-WMF (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as a misleading username. Impersonating WMF. Jdcomix (talk) 18:49, 29 July 2024 (UTC)
- Nope, that really is a WMF account! Pickersgill-Cunliffe (talk) 18:57, 29 July 2024 (UTC)
- Oh wow, neat. Jdcomix (talk) 18:59, 29 July 2024 (UTC)
- @Pickersgill-Cunliffe Can I ask how you determined that APaul-WMF is a genuine WMF account? TBH: I'd probably have blocked them myself, as they have no global contributions, and failed to add anything to their userpage to link to or clarify their formal position. I did find this, but am not confident how I should be interpreting it. Am I'm missing a trick somewhere? Cheers, Nick Moyes (talk) 21:35, 29 July 2024 (UTC)
- @Nick Moyes: The account was created on Meta on 14 April 2023 by JLam-WMF (see here). This appears to be the staff member who creates accounts for new hires. This isn't something I've come across before, so happy to be told otherwise..! Pickersgill-Cunliffe (talk) 22:27, 29 July 2024 (UTC)
- Novem Linguae's handy script gives APaul-WMF a pink highlight for me. Digging into the source, apparently the m:Title blacklist prevents WMF usernames from being registered, so we never have to worry about this kind of spoof. jlwoodwa (talk) 23:41, 29 July 2024 (UTC)
- Nice detective work Jlwoodwa :) I agree with your analysis and I believe it to be correct. –Novem Linguae (talk) 00:53, 30 July 2024 (UTC)
- Novem Linguae's handy script gives APaul-WMF a pink highlight for me. Digging into the source, apparently the m:Title blacklist prevents WMF usernames from being registered, so we never have to worry about this kind of spoof. jlwoodwa (talk) 23:41, 29 July 2024 (UTC)
- @Nick Moyes: The account was created on Meta on 14 April 2023 by JLam-WMF (see here). This appears to be the staff member who creates accounts for new hires. This isn't something I've come across before, so happy to be told otherwise..! Pickersgill-Cunliffe (talk) 22:27, 29 July 2024 (UTC)
Not a violation of the username policy. –Novem Linguae (talk) 03:50, 30 July 2024 (UTC)
- Nope, that really is a WMF account! Pickersgill-Cunliffe (talk) 18:57, 29 July 2024 (UTC)
- Dallyparton (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as a misleading username. See userpage. . Huntthetroll (talk) 22:18, 29 July 2024 (UTC)
Not a blatant violation of the username policy. It's an obvious parody username that is unlikely to mislead anyone. The user page was misleading and has been deleted. ~Anachronist (talk) 22:34, 29 July 2024 (UTC)
- InsidetheDelta (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as a promotional username. See Draft:Dewey Delta. jlwoodwa (talk) 01:33, 30 July 2024 (UTC)
Not a blatant violation of the username policy. Consider filing a report at the conflict of interest noticeboard. – robertsky (talk) 06:29, 30 July 2024 (UTC)
- Crackhead barney (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as a disruptive username. Huntthetroll (talk) 02:26, 30 July 2024 (UTC)
Wait until the user edits. I'm a little torn to be honest — not the nicest username, but is it disruptive? Hmm.. — TheresNoTime (talk • they/them) 10:13, 30 July 2024 (UTC)
- Truth69420 (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as a potentially disruptive username (the "69" and "420" are sexual and drug-related terms respectively) Sir MemeGod ._. (talk - contribs - created articles) 06:17, 30 July 2024 (UTC)
Comment: @Sir MemeGod have you seen the user talk page, contributions, or checked in with the account creator? – robertsky (talk) 07:18, 30 July 2024 (UTC)
Not a blatant violation of the username policy. I've been hoodwinked!, indeed! — TheresNoTime (talk • they/them) 10:10, 30 July 2024 (UTC)
- LoloBlue (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as a misleading username. Mick Blue?. -Lemonaka 09:03, 30 July 2024 (UTC)
Current requests for increase in protection level
[edit]Place requests for new or upgrading pending changes, semi-protection, full protection, move protection, create protection, template editor protection, or upload protection at the BOTTOM of this section. Check the archive of fulfilled and denied requests or, failing that, the page history if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Three seemingly different editors in the last 12 hours. SSSB (talk) 22:25, 29 July 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 10:13, 30 July 2024 (UTC)
Reason: Indefinite semi-protection: Violations of WP:BLP, he is a popular streamer so semi protecting it will stop the vandalism. Maxerajas31 (talk) 01:03, 30 July 2024 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Lectonar (talk) 10:14, 30 July 2024 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Per Wikipedia:General sanctions/Beauty pageants. { [ ( jjj 1238 ) ] } 01:09, 30 July 2024 (UTC)
Reason: Persistent IP vandalism dating back to June 24 and I'm tired of reverting it. It has been vandalized by IPs from the same range at least 14 times in the past month, and quite heavily just a few hours ago. AllTheUsernamesAreInUse (talk) 02:57, 30 July 2024 (UTC)
- List of cases of the January 6 United States Capitol attack (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Indefinite extended-confirmed protection: Contentious topic restriction. Post-1992 US politics related Warm Regards, Miminity (talk) (contribs) 03:01, 30 July 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. FMSky (talk) 03:26, 30 July 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Many IPs are changing info regarding an unofficial trade. BullDawg2021 (talk) 03:47, 30 July 2024 (UTC)
Reason: High amount of vandalism due to Acolyte. XCBRO172 (talk) 04:29, 30 July 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Shortly after the page's creation, it was posted by a popular fan Twitter account (https://x.com/OocDeath/status/1817992330894590336) and multiple IP users have since repeatedly added unreferenced content and trivia. I'd like to request semi-protection to save from the hassle of continuing to revert them. Di (they-them) (talk) 05:57, 30 July 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Target of vandalism (BLP) due to recent events he was involved with. Vinegarymass911 (talk) 08:59, 30 July 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. — Saqib (talk I contribs) 09:36, 30 July 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Two weeks should do it. Vinegarymass911 (talk) 09:56, 30 July 2024 (UTC)
Current requests for reduction in protection level
[edit]Before posting, first discuss with the protecting admin at their talk page. Post below only if you receive no reply.
- To find out the username of the admin who protected the page click on "history" at the top of the page, then click on "View logs for this page" which is under the title of the page. The protecting admin is the username in blue before the words "protected", "changed protection level" or "pending changes". If there are a number of entries on the log page, you might find it easier to select "Protection log" or "Pending changes log" from the dropdown menu in the blue box.
- Requests to downgrade full protection to template protection on templates and modules can be directed straight here; you do not need to ask the protecting admin first.
- Requests for removing create protection on redlinked articles are generally assisted by having a draft version of the intended article prepared beforehand.
- If you want to make spelling corrections or add uncontroversial information to a protected page please add {{Edit fully-protected}} to the article's talk page, along with an explanation of what you want to add to the page. If the talk page is protected please use the section below.
Reason: Talk:Israel–Hamas war should be non-protected because it is a talk page for a high-profile page it is okay if the article israel-hamas war stays extended-conformed-protected but ip editors should have somewhere to make at least edit requests to the article 173.72.3.91 (talk) 17:31, 29 July 2024 (UTC)
- This was protected as Arbitration enforcement and cannot be unprotected at this venue. You also are not allowed to be editing in this area in the first place outside of edit requests. —Jéské Couriano v^_^v threads critiques 17:45, 29 July 2024 (UTC)
Declined See above. Lectonar (talk) 07:48, 30 July 2024 (UTC)
Reason: The transfer of the player to his new club is now officially complete, the speculations of which was the main reason for the disruptive editing and why I initially requested the page to be protected. Vasil3fonov (talk) 18:45, 29 July 2024 (UTC)
Reason: England no longer needs this level of protection. 2A0A:EF40:E37:4201:ED2C:8CAC:8811:91B2 (talk) 00:30, 30 July 2024 (UTC)
- Considering the current XCP is due to prior vandalism from autocon-buster sockpuppets, this seems like a bad idea. —Jéské Couriano v^_^v threads critiques 04:03, 30 July 2024 (UTC)
Current requests for edits to a protected page
[edit]Please request an edit directly on the protected page's talk page before posting here
Ideally, requests should be made on the article talk page rather than here.
- Unless the talk page itself is protected, you may instead add the appropriate template among
{{Edit protected}}
,{{Edit template-protected}}
,{{Edit extended-protected}}
, or{{Edit semi-protected}}
to the article's talk page if you would like to make a change rather than requesting it here. Doing so will automatically place the page in the appropriate category for the request to be reviewed. - Where requests are made due to the editor having a conflict of interest (COI; see Wikipedia:Suggestions for COI compliance), the
{{Edit COI}}
template should be used. - Requests to move move-protected pages should be made at Wikipedia:Requested moves, not here.
- If the discussion page and the article are both protected preventing you from making an edit request, this page is the right place to make that request. Please see the top of this page for instructions on how to post requests.
- This page is not for continuing or starting discussions regarding content should both an article and its discussion page be protected. Please make a request only if you have a specific edit you wish to make.
In "Early life and education", the article says "In 2003 she enrolled at the University of Mississippi". The source for that paragraph as archived (https://archive.ph/ek0sE) states that she "dropped out for good in 2001".
I suggest changing "In 2003 she enrolled..." to something like "She enrolled at the University of Mississippi, studying journalism and political science and writing for The Daily Mississippian, but left the school in 2001." Or of course, add a source for her enrolling in 2003. Elizabeth Internet (talk) 06:56, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
Handled requests
[edit]A historical archive of previous protection requests can be found at Wikipedia:Requests for page protection/Archive.
5 protected edit requests | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Updated as needed. Last updated: 20:42, 29 July 2024 (UTC) |
16 template-protected edit requests | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Updated as needed. Last updated: 03:41, 30 July 2024 (UTC) |
WP:PERM
Requests for autopatrolled |
---|
Autopatrolled[edit]
Hello! I believe I've shown a sufficient track record of creating valid articles, and I plan to continue doing so. In particular, I have a list of red links with potential that I plan to create articles for in the near future, and I don't want to fill up the new page feed if I don't have to. Thanks for your time and consideration! Bsoyka (t • c • g) 06:48, 29 July 2024 (UTC) |
Requests for AutoWikiBrowser access |
---|
AutoWikiBrowser[edit]
Would be useful to make tedious edits. Un assiolo (talk) 22:31, 19 July 2024 (UTC)
Requesting so I can help streamline small edits like typos, general maintenance, and so on. NyanThousand (talk) 12:56, 23 July 2024 (UTC)
To tag pages for Wikipedia:WikiProject Anthropology/Oral tradition taskforce Kowal2701 (talk) 09:06, 28 July 2024 (UTC)
|
There are no outstanding requests for the confirmed flag. |
---|
Confirmed[edit] |
Requests for extended confirmation |
---|
Extended confirmed[edit]
Dear Wikipedia Administrators, I am writing to request extended confirmed user rights. I have come across several articles on Wikipedia that are incomplete or contain misleading information, and are currently under the extended confirmed protection policy. I believe these articles require attention and correction. Granting me extended confirmed user permissions would enable me to amend and improve these articles. Thank you for considering my request. IamAnisurrahman (talk) 07:08, 29 July 2024 (UTC)
|
There are no outstanding requests for the file mover flag. |
---|
File mover[edit] |
Requests for new page reviewer |
---|
New page reviewer[edit]
I want to reduce the massive backlog. I have been looking at the new pages patrol feed sporadically for the past two months and the backlog keeps increasing. I want to play a part in reviewing the articles. HRShami (talk) 11:19, 21 June 2024 (UTC)
Hello there, I am interested tn helping out in new page reviewing as there are very large articles backlog and love to do so. Xegma(talk) 07:10, 11 July 2024 (UTC)
I would like to request new page reviewer rights to help review newly-created articles and lower the backlog. I have accepted lots of drafts at AFC and participated in many AfDs with deep discussions to exhibit my knowledge of notability, as I was advised previously. Thanks! Waqar💬 19:55, 14 July 2024 (UTC)
With my expertise in the field, I am confident in my ability to assist fellow Wikipedians in reviewing newly created articles on Iranian art and culture, with a particular focus on modern and contemporary art. I would be grateful for the opportunity to contribute in this capacity and respectfully request the necessary permissions to do so. Persian-art-and-culture (talk) 10:59, 28 July 2024 (UTC)
Experience with AfC reviewing, as well as tagging pages for CSD (although I do not often tag pages for CSD). I meet all of the criteria, and have read the expectations and requirements for this role. I am looking to be a new page reviewer to try out new avenues for ways I can contribute to Wikipedia. I have a page for my AfC reviews, for easy viewing. OnlyNanotalk 18:36, 28 July 2024 (UTC) |
Requests for page mover |
---|
Page mover[edit]
I have been editing for over 7 years and I plan on using this permission in order to help with discussions on WP:RM and deal with cross-redirects for articles that should have more disambiguated titles. KingSkyLord (talk | contribs) 12:46, 2 July 2024 (UTC)
I'm a somewhat active AfC reviewer and new page patroller, so I often have to move pages to and from draftspace. Page mover rights will help reduce the number of R2 tags in the backlog. I also have some prior experience in RMs. Thanks for considering my request. (please
I am an active AfC reviewer, and I frequently move pages, either from userspace to draftspace, or publishing articles. My request for this privilege comes from my anti-vandalism work (which I am highly involved in). I notice several sleeper accounts, in their early stages, however I am unable to effectively take action with move vandalism in a productive manner. OnlyNanotalk 15:20, 28 July 2024 (UTC)
Was granted page mover for a few months; now requesting it to be extended as the expiry date is coming up. I admit in the interim I earned a 24h block for a 3RR violation that I had to learn from, so I understand if that's a reason it would be appropriate to decline this. Remsense诉 19:17, 28 July 2024 (UTC)
Reason for requesting page mover rights: I want to have my page mover rights extended, as I contribute to RM/TR. Was given 3mo trial and it will end on August 20. ToadetteEdit! 08:30, 29 July 2024 (UTC) |
Requests for pending changes reviewer |
---|
Pending changes reviewer[edit]
Hey there! I'm ThatOneWolf, and, I know I've been here twice before, but those times I admit I didn't really get the whole idea of experience and stuff. Plus, my last request was months ago. I took a little break recently when I just was checking my talk page and watchlist, but now I've come back to editing. Anyway, the reason I'm requesting Reviewer rights now is because I feel like I could help in that area, with most of my edits being vandalism reversions. I also feel I suitably warn editors when I think they are intending to vandalize, or just let them know if it seems they could be trying to help. I've read all the policies listed in Wikipedia:Reviewing pending changes, and am very familiar with the copyright laws. This is why I feel I would be more fit now to receive this right. Thanks for reading! -- ThatOneWolf (ChatEdits 12:18, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
I've been doing RCP for a little while now, and recently started NPP. I believe I could assist in patrolling recent changes to expand on my anti-vandalism work. Thanks, Lordseriouspig 06:20, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
Have experience in monitoring recent changes and believe this tool would help in improving Wikipedia as I generally know the difference between constructive and unconstructive changes MarksmanRifle (talk) 23:14, 27 July 2024 (UTC)
|
Requests for rollback |
---|
Rollback[edit]
I've been patrolling recent changes for a while now, using Twinkle to warn members. I have over 200 mainspace edits, and I'm extended confirmed with over 700 edits total. I've also been doing NPP for a little too. I'd like to use rollback for more advanced tools such as Huggle and AntiVandal. Thanks, Lordseriouspig 06:14, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
Have been participating in counter vandalism for a while now and have developed strong interest in continuing in this area of editing. I request this right to enhance my counter vandalism capacity. Ednabrenze (talk) 07:30, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
Mainly patrol the recent changes page for problematic edits, and believe that rollback would assist further with the most obvious vandalism MarksmanRifle (talk) 23:00, 27 July 2024 (UTC)
|
Requests for template editor |
---|
Template editor[edit]
I am a frequent editor and creator of templates and modules, and I have encountered several instances where having the template editor permission would be helpful. Many of my requested edits on protected templates have been performing minor visual fixes or fixing small bugs with the template's logic. For these uncontroversial edits, having to submit a request and involve another editor feels unnecessary, considering the nature of the requested edits. In other cases with more significant changes, going through the edit request process works fine for the most part, but I like to be able to avoid the process because of the backlog the edit queue can have at times and the added potential confusion added by having to request technical changes. Because of this, I'd much rather be able to have a standard discussion on template talk pages, if necessary, followed by implementing the agreed upon changes myself rather than having to request someone else to implement the changes. In the near future, I plan on exploring adding support for the new dark mode to more templates and being able to implement these changes on protected templates myself would be of great help. In the future, I would also like to use my technical knowledge of wikitext and Lua to help with processing the template edit request queue. Another issue that the template editor permission would resolve is that several templates I've created or rewrote are now template editor protected: Template:For-multi, Template:Country name, Template:Yearly archive list/display, Template:Visible anchor/styles.css, Template:Divbox/styles.css, and Module:Outdent. As a result, I am unable to edit them, which makes several of them difficult to maintain. Per the guidelines, three templates sandboxes I've worked on include Module:Jcon/sandbox, Template:Visible anchor/sandbox/styles.css, and Template:Infobox road/sandbox and at some requested template edits are [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7][8]. Also, I acknowledge that I performed what ended up being (unintentionally) disruptive templates several years ago. Since then, I have learned a lot about collaborating with others on Wikipedia and being mindful of the impact template edits can have on articles across the wiki. Since then, I have been much more careful with the edits I perform, as these past experiences have shown me the dangers of not doing so. With the template edit permission, I intend to take from these past mistakes, and I will follow the best practices to ensure the template edits I perform are well-tested, agreed upon, and non-disruptive. I find that now I am very cautious with my template edits, and I always create thorough test cases (e.g. Template:Jcon/testcases) before performing changes. – BrandonXLF (talk) 19:08, 28 July 2024 (UTC) |
Immediate requests
[edit]Category | Entries |
---|---|
Wikipedians looking for help | 0 |
Requests for unblock | 108 |
Candidates for speedy deletion as attack pages | 0 |
Candidates for speedy deletion as copyright violations | 1 |
Candidates for speedy deletion | 21 |
Wikipedia fully protected edit requests | 5 |
Deletion
[edit]Category | Entries |
---|---|
Articles for deletion | 461 |
Templates for deletion | 89 |
Categories for deletion | 136 |
Wikipedia files for discussion | 52 |
All redirects for discussion | 276 |
Miscellaneous pages for deletion | 39 |
Possible copyright violations | 27 |
All articles proposed for deletion | 150 |
All files proposed for deletion | 6 |
Unsorted AfD debates | 1 |
All files with the same name on Commons | 18 |
Image copyright problems
[edit]Category | Entries |
---|---|
Orphaned non-free use | 337 |
Unknown copyright status | 423 |
Unknown source | 416 |
No non-free use rationale | 1 |
Replaceable non-free use images | 14 |
Disputed non-free use images | 2 |
Page protection
[edit]Category | Entries |
---|---|
Protected | 10 |
Semi-protected user and user talk pages | 1,221 |
Fully protected user and user talk pages | 444 |
Protected against vandalism | 4 |
Protected talk pages of blocked users | 34 |
Semi-protected | 2,551 |
Arbitration 500/30 restricted | 0 |
Cleanup
[edit]
General cleanup | ||
Category | Entries | Percentage |
---|---|---|
All pages needing cleanup | 34,397 | 0.5 |
All articles needing rewrite | 5,771 | 0.08 |
All articles needing expert attention | 1,300 | 0.02 |
All Wikipedia articles in need of updating | 38,670 | 0.56 |
Reference problems | ||
Category | Entries | Percentage |
All pages needing factual verification | 10,814 | 0.16 |
All articles with unsourced statements | 522,242 | 7.61 |
All articles lacking sources | 85,437 | 1.25 |
All unreferenced BLPs | 767 | 0.07 |
All articles needing additional references | 460,372 | 6.71 |
All articles needing references cleanup | 4,396 | 0.06 |
All articles lacking in-text citations | 104,983 | 1.53 |
All articles with dead external links | 300,898 | 4.39 |
Image cleanup problems | ||
Category | Entries | Percentage |
Image files for cleanup | 17 | - |
Wikipedia files lacking a description | 138 | - |
Wikipedia files with unknown source | 17 | - |
Other problems | ||
Category | Entries | Percentage |
All articles to be merged | 1,892 | 0.03 |
All articles to be split | 800 | 0.01 |
Unsorted Stubs | 4 | - |
Stub categories | 19,221 | - |
All uncategorized pages | 801 | 0.01 |
All orphaned articles | 56,324 | 0.82 |
All articles needing copy edit | 2,912 | 0.04 |
All articles with style issues | 19,566 | 0.29 |
All Wikipedia articles needing context | 2,736 | 0.04 |
All articles that may contain original research | 16,549 | 0.24 |
Miscellaneous
[edit]Category | Entries |
---|---|
Requested moves | 281 |
All Wikipedia neutral point of view disputes | 7,639 |
All accuracy disputes | 15,699 |
Articles with invalid ISBNs | 1 |
Articles with invalid ISSNs | 2 |
All articles to be expanded | 66,177 |
Special pages
[edit]Maintenance reports | Information |
---|---|
Broken redirects | |
Dead-end pages | Dead-end pages |
Dormant pages | Dusty articles |
DoubleRedirects | Double redirects |
Lonely pages | Orphaned articles |
Long pages | |
New pages | New page patrol |
New pages feed | Page curation |
Protected pages | Protection policy |
Short pages | |
Uncategorized | Categorization |
Uncategorized cats | |
Uncategorized templates | |
Unused categories | |
Unused files (images) | |
Unused templates | |
Without interwiki links | |
Most interwiki links |
Sub-page listing
[edit]Hong Kong
[edit]![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/4/4e/Hknight_small.jpg/800px-Hknight_small.jpg)
Misc
[edit]![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
This is a Wikipedia user page. This is not an encyclopedia article or the talk page for an encyclopedia article. If you find this page on any site other than Wikipedia, you are viewing a mirror site. Be aware that the page may be outdated and that the user whom this page is about may have no personal affiliation with any site other than Wikipedia. The original page is located at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Winhunter. |
Multi-licensed with the Creative Commons Attribution Share-Alike License versions 1.0 and 2.0 | ||
I agree to multi-license my text contributions, unless otherwise stated, under Wikipedia's copyright terms and the Creative Commons Attribution Share-Alike license version 1.0 and version 2.0. Please be aware that other contributors might not do the same, so if you want to use my contributions under the Creative Commons terms, please check the CC dual-license and Multi-licensing guides. |