Jump to content

Talk:Lambeth Conference

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

POV

[edit]

The following sentences sound POV:

Experience has shown how valuable and wise this course was. The resolutions of the Lambeth Conferences have never been regarded as synodical decrees, but their weight has increased with each conference. Apprehensions such as those which possessed the mind of Dean Stanley have long passed away. (fifth paragraph)

Could someone knowledgeable on this subject check their accuracy/correctness? -- Kimiko 11:06, 13 May 2004 (UTC)[reply]

Newer conferences

[edit]

Does no one have information about the newer conferences? I know that at the last one there was some pretty hot debate about homosexuality, resulting in a compromise that left no one really happy. --Angr/comhrá 21:33, 14 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Well indeed yes, but preparing it takes time and knowledge. My detail knowledge gets very thin after the 1930 Conference because of the parameters of my research project. David (talk) 17:58, 9 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Anglicanism

[edit]

A new WikiProject focussing on Anglicanism and the Anglican Communion has just been initiated: WikiProject Anglicanism. Our goal is to improve and expand Anglican-reltaed articles. If anyone (Anglican or non-Anglican) is interested, read over the project page and consider signing up. Cheers! Fishhead64 06:40, 12 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Article's name

[edit]

Not singular? 212.84.103.144 (talk) 01:13, 26 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Lambeth Conferences. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 23:51, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Lambeth Conference. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:49, 11 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Lambeth Conference. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:56, 27 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Lambeth Conference. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:56, 16 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Revert

[edit]

Feel free to provide context for the "exorcism" incident that you feel is meaningful, or other incidents. It's better sourced than anything else in the section. –Roscelese (talkcontribs) 00:09, 22 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Dean Stanley

[edit]

Concerning the first Conference, the article quotes Dean Stanley's unhappiness about "the presence of prelates not belonging to our church". Who was he referring to? Were Anglicans outside the Church of England considered as "not belonging to our church"? Or were non-Anglicans present? What were the boundaries of "our church" in Stanley's view? Oudeístalk 16:25, 6 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Bibliography

[edit]

There are three sources in the bibliography that may need adjustment. They are the sources edited by Randall Davidson and Cosmo Gordon Lang. The Lang source doesn't actually credit him as an author or editor. I suspect the two Davidson sources don't credit him either. I don't know how to cite a source in the main text if it doesn't have an author, so someone will need to verify that these three books have no credited author and make the needed adjustments.

Lambeth 2022

[edit]

This article needs to be updated to cover the current conference. m.e. (talk) 09:22, 30 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

"Current conference"? Wikipedia is an encyclopedia for the long-term, not a newspaper for today's 'current' news. See WP:NOTNEWS. Yes, in due course (i.e. in the weeks and months ahead), the section about 2022 conference should be updated about notable items and outcomes, using reliable sources. In due course. But meanwhile, if you want to know what is happening there now (in the "current conference" try trusted news outlets. Feline Hymnic (talk) 15:02, 30 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]