Jump to content

Talk:Issues in anarchism

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links on Issues in anarchism. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:02, 17 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Merge back into Anarchism § Key issues?

[edit]

Since this article is a summary style split from anarchism summarizing the key issues commonly discussed in sources Anarchism § Key issues, I'm left wondering why we need a separate article at all. Since this article largely summarizes the existing breakout articles we have on each topic, we could instead further summarize the gist of each and fit this within the aforementioned section rather than having both the Key issues section and this breakout article. czar 23:56, 22 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Out of date

[edit]
Anarchists typically discourage the concept of left-wing theories of anarchism on grounds of redundancy and that it lends legitimacy to the notion that anarchism is compatible with capitalism or nationalism.

I get that this is what anarchists believe, but this position is completely out of date and incongruous with criticism of right-wing anarchism in the west, which explicitly believes that the state is "undesirable, unnecessary and harmful". Now, you can either accept this, and incorporate the huge body of work by writers like Jane Mayer, Anne Nelson, Nancy MacLean, and dozens of others, or you can continue to promote these out of date ideas and pretend that right-wing anarchism doesn't exist. It just makes you look out of touch. The west has a serious, ongoing problem with right-wing anarchism, and having the left say that it doesn't exist is extremely unhelpful, and frankly supports the right by failing to criticize it. Silence is complicity. Right-wing oligarchs in the west identify as anarchists, whether you choose to accept it or not. This position by left-anarchists reminds me very much of Christians who deny Christian nationalism exists. It's the same tendency. Viriditas (talk) 02:03, 31 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]