Talk:Scholastic Corporation

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Scholastic Corporation article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1: 90 days

This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Companies High‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany articles

High This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Companies To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Wikipedia:Requested articles/Business and economics/Companies
Assess : Category:Unassessed company articles
Copyedit : Category:Company articles needing attention
Infobox : Category:Company articles needing infoboxes
Maintain : Portal:Companies
Stubs : Help expand stub articles located at Category:Company stubs
Other :
- Tag company articles with the {{portal|Companies}} template
- Tag company talk pages with the {{WikiProject Companies}} project banner
- Answer requests for comments

Children's literature High‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Children's literature, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Children's literature on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Children's literatureWikipedia:WikiProject Children's literatureTemplate:WikiProject Children's literaturechildren and young adult literature articles

High

This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Tasks you can do:

Here are some open tasks for WikiProject Children's literature, an attempt to create and standardize articles related to children's literature. Feel free to help with any of the following tasks.

Add {{Portal|Children's literature}} to the See also section of related articles.
Tag the talk pages of related articles with {{WikiProject Children's literature}}
Join WikiProject Children's literature and list yourself as a Participant in the project.
Cleanup: A cleanup listing for this project is available. See also the list by category, the tool's wiki page and the index of WikiProjects.
Deletion discussions: listed at Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Literature
Notability: Articles with notability concerns, listed at WikiProject Notability
Rate the Unassessed articles in the Children's literature WikiProject.
References: Add references to Unreferenced BLPs.
Requested articles: Create a requested article on literature
Stubs: Improve a stub-class article

edit

Pennsylvania Low‑importance

	Pennsylvania portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pennsylvania, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Pennsylvania on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PennsylvaniaWikipedia:WikiProject PennsylvaniaTemplate:WikiProject PennsylvaniaPennsylvania articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

New York City Low‑importance

	New York City portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject New York City, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of New York City-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New York CityWikipedia:WikiProject New York CityTemplate:WikiProject New York CityNew York City articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

New entry to this History section

On October 22, 2020, Scholastic celebrated it’s 100th anniversary. 2600:1008:B104:EC55:1D60:13E4:E629:8798 (talk) 00:55, 3 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You mean "its", presumably. Are you a native English speaker? Many of your edits have been grammatically disruptive. Julietdeltalima (talk) 02:39, 14 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

New entry to this history section

In December 2015, Scholastic launched the Scholastic Reads Podcasts. 2600:1008:B1A2:D5C:ECE1:493B:FDE5:8068 (talk) 18:53, 9 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

New entry to this history section

Scholastic became involved in the television market in 2018. 2600:1008:B11E:E4DC:11B5:3F45:86BE:C03E (talk) 23:07, 20 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Source? Schazjmd (talk) 23:08, 20 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

New entry to this scholastic entertainment section

In 2017, Scholastic released the Magic School Bus Rides Again with Nickelodeon productions. 2600:1008:B12E:C259:8DB:F9B3:C5F3:22C7 (talk) 16:19, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

New entry to this history section

In 2016, Scholastic published dog man by Dav pilkey. 2600:1008:B12E:C259:511:5EE3:69CA:2F21 (talk) 23:19, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

New entry to this scholastic entertainment section

In 1995, Scholastic Productions produced the very hungry caterpillar and other stories with illuminated films. 2600:1008:B189:4752:FC86:612E:290D:52A6 (talk) 22:38, 10 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Updates

This information about the Scholastic Corporation needs some updates 2601:246:5401:9DCC:9538:A06C:90AE:BF41 (talk) 23:59, 24 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Home Base

Hi, I’m a stupid teen, but could someone add a section about Homebase? It’s one of their side projects, kinda burning down rn, but I figured it should be noted. One problem though- I can’t find ANY information on it besides the official launchers, and a quick blurb on the Dogman wiki, of all places. So uhhh yeah- 73.216.104.71 (talk) 20:31, 25 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Corporate Bias

The article itself feels a little bit too biased to the corporation, as if Scholastic themselves made the page. First of all, the page doesn’t have any criticism or controversy sub sections which is always a big red flag for me. Then, the article itself feels a bit too happy, without looking into some more negative aspects of the company. Dumdum56 (talk) 12:31, 5 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

"Graphix" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Graphix has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 November 9 § Graphix until a consensus is reached. Jay 💬 07:11, 9 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]